Explore. Create. Go viral.

[Subject]
A split-panel AI image comparison poster showing two ultra-close human eye crops side by side, each panel focused on a female eye region framed by thin round eyeglasses, dark eyebrow hairs visible in high detail, long curled eyelashes, skin texture and pores preserved at macro range, subtle blush and warm natural complexion, one iris appearing vivid emerald green on the left and the other appearing olive-green to blue-green on the right, editorial benchmark aesthetic, highly controlled side-by-side testing layout, photoreal skin detail, precision comparison design, not a single portrait, not anime, not illustration.

[Environment]
No real environment beyond the face crop itself, the image operates as a visual comparison card or benchmark post, each half isolated in a tall rounded-rectangle panel against a dark teal or blue-green outer background, bottom text labels identifying model outputs, small prompt text centered near the lower middle, zero background narrative, zero room context, zero scenery, the “environment” is the graphic layout of the comparison itself.

[Composition/Camera]
Vertical side-by-side diptych layout, extreme macro crop tightly centered on the eye region, both panels aligned to mirror each other structurally, nose bridge partially visible near the center split, eyeglass rim cutting through the lower eye zone, eyebrow and upper cheek filling the rest of the frame, rounded-corner card styling, social-post benchmark composition, strong bilateral symmetry with meaningful micro-differences, informational visual design rather than expressive portrait framing.

[Lighting]
Soft diffuse frontal light with controlled reflections in the irises, skin rendered evenly without deep shadow, enough highlight to show pore structure and curvature of the glasses, no hard flash, no stylized color gels, realistic beauty-tech demo lighting intended to expose texture fidelity and eye rendering quality fairly across both panels.

[Style/Rendering]
Photoreal AI benchmark poster, ultra-detailed eye macro comparison, clean tech-review social card, model-versus-model evaluation format, realistic skin and lash detail, controlled beauty close-up, graphic presentation layer with typography, modern AI image-generation comparison aesthetic, emphasis on fidelity testing, texture truthfulness, and micro-detail reproducibility.

[Detail constraints]
Preserve the split-panel comparison format.
Keep both eyes close in framing and scale.
Maintain the thin round eyeglass rim in both panels.
Preserve eyebrow density, lashes, under-eye skin texture, and cheek pores.
Keep the iris colors distinct between left and right panels.
Retain the rounded-rectangle card feel with a narrow divider.
Keep bottom label text areas present as part of the visual concept.
Avoid turning this into a normal face portrait.
Avoid fantasy makeup, excessive retouching, or plastic skin.
Preserve the tech-demo / benchmark-post logic.

Negative prompt:
single portrait, anime eyes, doll skin, over-smoothed face, missing glasses rim, broken symmetry, extra eyes, duplicate eyelashes, warped brows, low-detail pores, unrealistic macro blur, textless crop, cluttered background, cinematic scenery, bokeh room, fantasy makeup, neon cyberpunk, painterly texture, watercolor, posterized skin, overexposed highlights, muddy skin tones, weird eye reflections, unreadable comparison layout, distorted face anatomy, AI mush, watermark clutter beyond intended comparison text

Suggested parameters:
Model family: SDXL photoreal macro / realism checkpoint
Aspect ratio: 4:5 or tall social card
CFG / guidance: 5.5-7
Steps: 30-40
Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras or equivalent
Priority controls: eye realism, pore detail, comparison symmetry, card layout preservation

Delta prompt strategy:
1. If the output collapses into one face, add “side-by-side diptych comparison card, two separate macro eye panels.”
2. If the skin gets over-retouched, add “visible pores, natural under-eye texture, realistic cheek surface detail.”
3. If the glasses disappear, add “thin round eyeglass rim crossing the lower eye region in both panels.”
4. If the comparison feels messy, add “clean benchmark layout, rounded-rectangle panels, narrow central divider.”
5. If the eyes become stylized, add “photoreal human eye macro, natural sclera, realistic iris reflections, documentary fidelity.”
6. If the panels look identical, add “subtle but visible model variation in iris color, texture rendering, and skin grain.”
7. If lighting becomes dramatic, add “soft frontal test lighting, neutral beauty-tech illumination, no cinematic shadows.”
8. If the result loses social-card feel, add “AI model comparison post, bottom labels, prompt caption, review-card presentation.”
9. If the crop becomes too wide, add “extreme close-up macro crop centered on eye, eyebrow, upper cheek, and nose bridge.”
10. If the image drifts into generic ad beauty, add “technical fidelity comparison, benchmark visual, micro-detail evaluation graphic.”